The address of the Crimese Bridge is the ultimate strategic purpose of destroying, British Colonel Grant
To mention this, he told us that Espresso was definitely the original goal of the strategic meaning of the Crimean City. His destruction would have broken up a vehicle with Crime, causing Russia to rely on sea or dry routes to create logistic problems. Also, any delay due to the destruction of railway bridges will make it even more difficult to move the Russians, "said Grant, the operations in the rear require active actions directly on the front line. Only under these conditions can give the positive effect, "Although asymmetrical actions can be effective, especially for the extracurricular operations, I'm skeptical of their immediate impact against the total resources and the ability of Russia. The asymmetrical actions often require more grace and more marine drones that can be difficult. The asymmetrical actions really only have the power when they're directly connected to operations on the forefront. It's just that the emphasis on the tank may not be given the desired effect on the front if they're not met with strategic invention, "he added. On January 6th, the head of the United Defense Force of South Ukraine announced that the occupants were actively trying to protect the Crimese City from the air and 25 February Chief of Minooni Defense Kyiv thanked the villagers for help and advised the civilians not to drive the Crimean Bridge, accompanied by "new surprises for the occupation in 2024."